While the Nottingham Post seeks conspiracy in everything Nottingham Labour does. Papers in Bristol says how much better out City is under Labour compared to Lib Dem controlled Bristol.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=218
While the Nottingham Post seeks conspiracy in everything Nottingham Labour does. Papers in Bristol says how much better out City is under Labour compared to Lib Dem controlled Bristol.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=218
Today Nottingham City Council unveiled our draft budget for 2012/13. We face unprecedented challenge…
Ive also got a second opinion piece, written by Councillor Chapman, for your info. Come on Eric, giv…
Dear All, The BBC Trust is currently consulting on the future of local radio stations such as BBC Ra…
I thought youd be interested in a news story that covers Greg Clarks praise for Core Cities Localism…
Thought you may be interested in this press statement put out by our Deputy Leader, Cllr Graham Chap…
My Open letter to the people of Nottingham: I would like to thank you for your help during the distu…
While the Nottingham Post seeks conspiracy in everything Nottingham Labour does. Papers in Bristol says how much better out City is under Labour compared to Lib Dem controlled Bristol.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=218
Today Nottingham City Council unveiled our draft budget for 2012/13. We face unprecedented challenges but were seeking to protect vital services. Below is a press release from Cllr Chapman which I hope youll read.
A Council Budget protecting our priorities despite 189 per person cuts
At Tuesdays meeting of Nottingham City Councils Executive Board Councillors will launch the consultation over the Councils budget for 2012/2013.
Nottingham City Council is facing a funding gap of 20m next year, on top of a real terms cut of 60m last year. There will be a further 12m next year and 12m the year after.
Nottingham City Council has had to cut 189 per citizen in the last two years. Compared to just 1 per person for Tory Wokingham, Berkshire. Deputy Leader, Cllr Graham Chapman said: Last year we found out Dorset got an increase, now we find rich rural Tory Councils have to cut just 1 per person, compared to our 189. The top 10% most deprived areas will lose four times as much in spending power as the least deprived 10%. Its just another example of a Government hitting the poorest hardest.
Despite the cuts the City Council is trying to protect:
Jobs,
Vulnerable children and adults,
Front-line services,
Tackling crime and
Anti Social Behaviour and keeping Nottinghams position as Englands cleanest big city.
Cllr Graham Chapman, said: The Government are cutting too far and too fast. With local government taking a heavy hit. Nottingham has also been carrying an unfair burden of the cuts. Weve had to cut 189 per citizen, compared to Wokinghams 1. Thats not fair on Nottingham.
However, were trying to protect what matters to the people of Nottingham. With Government cuts stagnating the economy were protecting investment in jobs programmes such as our Nottingham Jobs Plan and our investment on lines two and three of the Tram and the station.
Despite unprecedented demand weve refused this year to reduce the level of service in adult care, making Nottingham one of the few places in England still offering services to high moderate citizens and were doing all we can to protect children.
We are also squeezing every penny out of our back office costs in order to protect front-line services. We have saved over 2.5m by swapping interest rates on loans or taking out low cost borrowing. The East Midlands Shared Services programme is another example. We are working together with other Councils to protect the services which matter to local people.
And of course were looking to protect our greatest achievements. Crime is down by 50% in Nottingham over the past few years. The Tories, with the Lib Dems, are cutting the Police budget by 20% but were going to spend every penny we can to tackle crime and Anti-Social Behaviour. Nottingham was also proud to be named Englands cleanest big city last year and were protecting that spending and our commitment to make peoples neighbourhoods as clean as our City Centre.
We have done all we can to cut the back office and are still having to take difficult front line decisions. Just some of the difficult decisions are:
The transfer of Portland Leisure Centre to the third sector,
Increasing Adults Fees Charges,
Ending the pilot of specialised Food Waste Collection,
Reducing Brewhouse Yard Museum to a group or school visitor attraction, like Newstead Abbey,
Cuts to Connexions services
Increasing Council Tax by 3.49%
One of those difficult decisions is to increase Council Tax by 3.49%. It is a choice however we must make. Eric Pickles has offered us a Payday loan of 2.5m, but its simply a trap. Next year if we take Mr. Pickles money well have to raise Council Tax by 5% to just keep up or make another 2.5m worth of cuts, on top of the 12m gap we already face. Thatll be 2.5m lost forever. Nottingham isnt the only Council set to increase Council Tax. Leicester and Tory run Peterborough are just a couple.
Not only that but the Government is set to devolve Council Tax benefits to Councils based on next years Council Tax collection rates, with a 10% top slice. Not increasing Council Tax by 3.49% will cost the City 1.1m a year, forever.
Cllr Chapman warned caution on future years: While were doing our best to protect these valuable services we have to make difficult cuts. Savings we dont want to make and cuts which we believe will further take demand out of the economy and harm Nottingham. This year weve been able to protect jobs, vulnerable adults and children, front-line services, the fight against crime and Anti Social Behaviour and clean streets but if the Government doesnt change course we cannot promise we wont have to make even more difficult decisions next year. The net effect will be to force British local government into an American system of minimal provision. Weve gone through the flesh now and we are beginning to get to the bone.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=213
Ive also got a second opinion piece, written by Councillor Chapman, for your info.
Come on Eric, give Greg Clark something useful to do
11 November, 2011 | By Graham Chapman
The appointment of Greg Clark as Minister for cities back in the summer was not just another idea Eric Pickles dreamed up in the bath but a decision loaded with significance.
First, it was a recognition by a party steeped in rural and suburban tradition and interest that cities were the key motor for growth in theUK.
Second, even more significantly, it was a recognition that there needed to be some genuflection towards a policy for growth at a time when the economy was flattening in a way the government had not predicted.
The problem is that the new minister was dealt a fairly poor hand.
Much damage had already been inflicted on cities and their prospects for growth in the form of local government cuts and cuts in regional budgets in which the poorer the city was, the more it lost.
There was no Plan B for growth to support Mr Clark. And for some months at least, he was Plan B.
Most of the instruments necessary to deliver growth the Regional Development Agencies in particular had been abolished and replaced with a loose and enfeebled system of Local Enterprise Partnerships.
The economy has continued to deteriorate and Mr Clark has no money, which has forced him into spending time not on growth but on process such as additional freedoms to make economic decisions. To give him credit, he has done it quite well but it is all jam tomorrow.
If cities are to be the motors of future growth then the minister and his government have got to get over a number of their hang-ups.
First, the problem for cities is not supply but demand, yet the response of government is mainly supply side. Credit easing is probably a good thing but it will take a long time to get going and there will be few takers if demand continues to dry up. Quantitative easing, on the other hand, is simply an efficient way of misallocating huge sums of money most of which are likely to bypass the productive economy in which cities are involved.
Second, you cant keep blaming everything on the Euro crisis. The problem of demand isnt just to do with exports, which are doing relatively well. Its to do with the collapse of the construction industry and languid demand in retail. We have an indigenous problem and the government should admit it.
Third, the public sector is not some parasitic leach living off the body private. Those cities which succeed do so where productive public sector investment underpins private sector growth.
The irony is that, despite declaring there is no Plan B, the government is gradually accepting the need for an alternative strategy. However, whether its called Plan B or Plan A+, because of government reticence, it is creeping out form undergrowth in an apologetic way which leaves it looking uncoordinated, contradictory and constantly behind the curve.
The Regional Growth Fund is supposed to be a major element but it is a third of what was being invested in key sectors by the RDAs and little of the 470m allocated to date has been spent. LEPs have no funding of their own to allocate and have only recently received a token amount to provide administrative support so, despite oozing lots of goodwill, they are not an effective tool. They have had some success in the recent RGF but they have no capacity to help deliver schemes.
The emphasis on cities is looking fairly contradictory in that the government is about to take yet another disproportionate slice of demand out of them in the form of cuts to local government and further benefit cuts in 2012-13. The government is also sending out mixed messages to foreign investors, having told the world after the summer disturbances that Britainis broken, and by implication that cities are the most broken part, it is now belatedly trying to reinstil confidence by talking theUKup.
Finally the grim and distorted budget message, that we are potentially in a as bad a positionGreeceunless government spending and by implication spending in cities, is substantially reduced, does not inspire confidence in anyone hoping to invest.
If we need to create more liquidity in the economy then we should be targeting key sectors and key physical sites in order to revive demand and, at the same, time lay foundations for future growth.
The plethora of enterprise zones could be the first blocks in an alternative strategy. Currently they have been designated but there has been little indication of what pump priming they will receive other than some vague promise of superfast broadband. The recent allocation of RGF funding missed out a number of enterprise zones leaving their future very much in the air. Yet they will not take off without infrastructure cost being borne mainly by the public sector.
As for key sectors, these are almost self selecting creative industries especially those linked to digital technology; science, particularly those aspects which can create employment; green energy where there is enormous capacity for reviving the construction industry; transport infrastructure for the same reasons; high-speed broadband; land preparation; and most of all skills training, using the opportunity of unemployment to retrain workers in order to fill the national skills gap.
The trebling of the RGF and involving the LEPs is a prerequisite, as is a substantial increase in the transport investment and support for manufacturing by substantially increasing capital allowances. All this is geared not just at restoring demand but also improving the competiveness and reinvigorating building sector with rapid multiplier effect on the rest of the economy.
If extra liquidity is directed towards investment in productive sectors the government will no longer have the excuse that the markets would react negatively to government spending.
Indeed, investment of this ilk with payback in the form of productive growth should reassure rather than scare the markets.
It might also mean that the minister for cities would finally have something to get his teeth into.
Graham Chapman (Lab) is deputy leader of Nottingham City Council
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=203
Dear All,
The BBC Trust is currently consulting on the future of local radio stations such as BBC Radio Nottingham, the consultation period closes on Wednesday and Im hoping youll get involved and protect local radio.
With 12% cuts to local radio proposed there is a potential dilution and loss of quality of key local radio news programmes. Stations will have to pool their mid-afternoon slot with those in their approximate vicinity. Between 10pm and 1am stations will broken down into five super-regions, while from 7pm to 10pm a BBC England service will air the same, centrally-produced show.
Additionally both morning and drive time are likely to end up merely churning out of second- hand under-researched and under-prepared programmed. As a consequence a number of things will happen:
1 - The BBCs reputation for quality will be undermined
2 - The news coverage will be unable to fulfil its function of both informing the public accurately but also holding local decision makers to account. I write as someone often held to account on the radio. Democracy will suffer.
3 - Poorer, more generalised reporting will help sever the links with the local community. RadioNottingham has increased its listenership by around 29,000 since 2003 to over 200,000. Many of the audience listen only to Radio Nottingham and that is because of the quality of the local content.
The consultation closes on Wednesday 21st December, so you only have 48 hours to respond, and can be found: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/consult/local_radio.shtml
Please get involved and help protect local radio.
P.S. Patrick Fosters article in Mondays Media Guardian which refers to some of the stuff which BBC Nottingham including the Big Night Out which was so important after the summer disturbances http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/11/bbc-local-radio-cuts?INTCMP=SRCH
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=207
I thought youd be interested in a news story that covers Greg Clarks praise for Core Cities Localism Bill amendment and the response of our Deputy Leader, Councillor Chapman, to the Growing Cities Fund.
City calls for Clark to embrace role
11 November, 2011 | By Jim Dunton
The deputy leader of one of the Core Cities councils has questioned the power Greg Clark has to enact his newly created minister for cities role.
In an online-only opinion piece for LGC, Nottingham City Councils deputy leader Graham Chapman (Lab) argues that communities secretary Eric Pickles needs to put more substance and significantly more cash behind the new ministerial brief.
His words come as Mr Clark praised Core Cities for its contribution towards a significant breakthrough in opening up a route to greater devolution.
Mr Clark told fellow MPs in the House of Commons this week that the groups amendment to the Localism Bill, developed in partnership with crossbench MPs, would provide an important new power.
It will allow us to enact, without the need for primary legislation, agreed transfers of power between local authorities and central government, he said.
I should like to put on record my gratitude to the leaders and officers of the Core Cities group for their help.
The amendment opens the door to greater local control over investment to drive growth in housing and planning, economic development, or pooling resources and effort across functioning economic areas.
It means cities can be more joined-up about local investment, moving on from case by case funding applications, saving time and money.
Earlier in the week, Cllr Chapman warned that the governments promise of 17.4m for Nottinghamthrough the Growing Places Fund was just a drop in the ocean for the city, and called for serious steps towards Tax Increment Financing.
It sounds like a lot but it isnt, he said.
It would, for example, pay for one school to be developed, thats great but we need 164m to develop the A453, stopped by the government.
90m is needed to develop a number of schools, stopped when this government axed the Building Schools for the Future programme.
You start to see that while 17m is very nice, its a drop in the ocean of whats needed to get Nottinghams economy really kick started.
A serious level of investment in serious infrastructure will pay its way in the form of tax returns stimulated by growth.
He added that there were fears the fund was so complex that bureaucracy to support it would impinge on cash available for investment.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=197
Thought you may be interested in this press statement put out by our Deputy Leader, Cllr Graham Chapman, on the governments announcement of 17m Growing Places Fund for Nottingham.
17m Growing Places Fund a welcome drop in the ocean
The Deputy Leader of Nottingham City Council, Cllr Graham Chapman, has welcomed the Governments promise of 17.4m for Nottingham but warned it is just a drop in the ocean.
Weve been arguing for capital investment in the City, in order to stimulate growth and get people working, but while the Government appears to be changing course but its nowhere near meets the need for infrastructure. Cllr Chapman said.
Cllr Chapman said: 17m sounds a lot but it isnt. It would, for example, pay for one school to be developed, thats great but we need 164m to develop the A453, stopped by the Government. Boots wanted 230m to develop their site, it was a bit of an optimistic bid but showed the nature of the problem. 90m is needed to develop a number of schools, stopped when this Government axed the Building Schools for the Future Programme. You start to see that while 17m is very nice, its a drop in the ocean of whats needed to get Nottinghams economy really kick started. A serious level of investment in serious infrastructure will pay its way in the form of tax returns stimulated by growth.
Im also worried the Growing Places Fund is so complex the bureaucracy needed to extract money will drill down on the available cash to invest. While well be thankful for every penny we can spend on gettingNottinghampeople into work and stimulating growth; the Government needs to take investment seriously. Concluded Cllr Chapman
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=192
Nottingham City Council Labour Group are looking to recruit a full time Agent to lead campaign organisation for the Group. The job includes supporting the Campaign Officer and Group Leader in the functions and organisation of the Labour Group’s political activities and campaigning across the city.
Applications must be by CV and a letter of application outlining why you would be suited for the role, no more then two sides of A4 and returned by 5pm on the16th September to job@nottinghamlabour.org.uk or to David Mellen, Labour Group Campaign Officer, 447 Meadow Lane, Nottingham, NG2 3GB. Interviews are scheduled for 3rd October.
For more information or a full job description please contact David Mellen on job@nottinghamlabour.org.uk or 07759 829654
My Open letter to the people of Nottingham:
I would like to thank you for your help during the disturbances last week. The council and the Police value the support and cooperation of local people.
Last week a small number of people showed a side ofNottinghamwhich is unacceptable and which will not be tolerated. But the vast majority of people showedNottinghamat its best, with a really positive response from citizens, council staff and Notts Police who did an excellent job.
I think its important that we thank our communities for their spirited response during and after the disturbances, who rallied in support of the Police and local businesses.
Id also like to thank the many young people who didnt engage in the disorder, the parents who acted responsibly and the community leaders who urged calm.
Thousands of people turned out to enjoy the Caribbean Carnival and take part in other events, including the key football match between Nottingham Forest and Notts County, which shows what Nottingham is really all about.
Yours sincerely
Cllr Jon Collins, Leader of Nottingham City Council Chair of the Police Authority
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=187
Nottingham City Council Leader Councillor Jon Collins has praised Nottinghamshire Police for their swift and professional action in dealing with a night of disturbances on the citys streets.
More than 240 police officers were out last night across the city, including 100 special constables, a mounted police unit and dog unit. During the course of the night, police officers made 90 arrests and have detained many who took part in, and incited a series of sporadic outbreaks of arson, criminal damage and other crimes.
Nottingham City Council provided vital support with youth service officers and councillors engaging with citizens in communities around the city during the evening, along with Community Protection Officers and Police Community Support Officers putting in extra shifts to provide a reassuring uniformed presence and advice. Cleansing teams worked hard to clean up quickly after any incidents. The City Council, in close liaison with the police, will today continue to monitor the situation and prepare for any further incidents.
Council Leader and Chair of Nottinghamshire Police Authority Jon Collins said:
Nottinghamshire Police deserve our thanks and praise for the way they have managed another evening of frankly disgusting behaviour from a mindless minority. The support that Nottingham residents have shown overnight shows that local people will not tolerate this behaviour and we will work together, with the Police, to bring these criminals to justice. We expect that anyone who is found guilty should be severely punished. We are committed to keeping Nottingham a safe place and we will not allow anybody who deliberately flouts the law in this way to threaten the safety of local people, families and hard-working businesses.
Whilst hundreds of incidents were reported overnight, Nottinghamshire Police have managed to limit the scale and severity by responding quickly and expertly as reports came in. Minor damage at a number of neighbourhood police stations has been reported, as well as a number of vehicle fires. A smash and grab attempt at a city centre jewellers ended in an arrest but no instances of looting occurred. A strong and united presence, together with the support of Nottinghams Community Protection Officers, led to large gatherings being dispersed quickly and led to many criminals being caught in the act.
The vast majority of incidents involved rowdiness, criminal damage and arson. No public injuries have been reported.
Local people have flooded social media sites Twitter and Facebook to show their support for last nights operations and today the Police have praised football fans attending last nights Carling Cup clash between Nottingham Forest and Notts County for their impeccable behaviour.
Assistant Chief Constable Paul Scarrott, who commanded the policing operation overnight, promised that all those who took part in the evenings criminality will be arrested, charged and taken to court.
Nottinghamshire Police have issued a call to any residents waking up this morning to find that their cars or homes have been damaged overnight should contact police immediately to help with investigations. Residents can visit their local station this morning to report crime. Alternatively, contact Nottinghamshire Police on 0300 300 99 99 or approach one of the many neighbourhood police officers who will be out and about in the community this morning speaking to residents.
Anyone who has information about those responsible for last nights disturbances can call the Force on the 0300 number, visit a local station or ring Crimestoppers on 0800 555111 and speak anonymously.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=181
Yesterday in the July meeting of Nottingham City Councils Full Council I was asked about Nottinghams latest job figures. Below is my response, thought people might be interested to see what were doing to meet out manifesto commitments.
The latest unemployment statistics for Nottingham, showing unemployment at 6% are very disappointing but clearly justify why at the local elections in May we made this a priority issue for the Council to tackle. The current position is a reflection of a range of factors, including the impact of Government cuts to public services. Within Nottingham, a particular challenge has been presented by single parents being moved from Income Support to Job Seekers Allowance and by the ending of the successful Future Jobs Fund.
In our election manifesto we made cutting unemployment by a quarter over the next four years one of our top 5 promises.
We will do this by:
Investing 1m in the Nottingham Jobs Fund a locally designed and funded replacement scheme for the Future Jobs Fund to give young people real experience of the workplace;
Ensuring that more Nottingham City residents take up Nottingham City Council jobs, and ensuring that all entry level jobs are converted to Apprenticeships;
Creating 1,000 new jobs in the science and energy sector through our science city based work around the energy park and approaches to creating green tech jobs;
Securing local jobs through the establishment of Section 106 agreements in major developments, creating 500 jobs in the construction industry;
Creating an employer hub to connect local unemployed people to the jobs that are coming through the pipeline;
Running jobs fairs in local neighbourhoods throughout the City,
Running a social enterprise support scheme to support the creation of new social enterprises and entrepreneurship more generally.
Attracting new job opportunities into Nottingham through encouraging and promoting capital investment in the City and in particular through the Enterprise Zone, construction at the Station and lines 2 and 3 of the Tram, and the development of Victoria and Broadmarsh shopping centres.
The 1980s and early 1990s under the last Conservative government underlined for many of us the damage long-term unemployment has within our communities as generations of youngsters grew up without an understanding of the world of work or any expectation that beyond school, there was a job for them. The current governments mismanagement of the economy and their indifference to rising youth unemployment in particular raises the prospect of similar damage being done to our communities all over again.
Thats why we are determined to tackle this issue head on and believe that with this approach we will be able to save and create jobs over the next four years.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=176
On the 24th June 2011 Nottingham Post gave the impression that I was preventing my Council e-mails being made available under the Freedom of Information Act. I believe this was misleading since all my Council e-mails are covered by the act and the Council has spend hundreds of thousands of pounds of City tax-payers money providing this information to the Nottingham Post and other newspapers and media.
But when it come to access to information it seems the Nottingham Posts attitude seems to be do what we say not do what we do. What have they got to hide or is it just hypocrisy?Ill leave you todraw your own conclusions from my correspondence with their Editor below.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=153
Its hard to believe how quickly the time has flown by since Nottinghams local elections took place last month.
And there are a couple of things to reflect on about the elections before they fade too far from the memory.
Firstly, can I also thank everyone who came out to vote. Turnout was 37.6% which, while it was still at the lower end of what we would like to see, was up by 5% and that continues an improving trend in our city.
Secondly, we saw 21 new city councillors elected with notable success for a number of younger candidates from a variety of backgrounds which can only be good news for the democratic process. Of course, there were also a number of long-standing councillors who had either decided not to stand or lost their seats and I would like to thank them for their dedication to serving Nottingham during their time on the Council. Thats particularly true of Gary Long and Andrew Price, the former Leaders of the Councils Liberal Democrat and Conservative Groups who, politics aside, always showed a commitment to Nottingham and the kind of independent judgement that made them easy to work with.
Last Monday, at a meeting of the City Council, we debated and adopted the Labour manifesto we stood on at the elections as council policy over the next four years. Much of the debate was discussion about what next for the coming years and what are the big issues that we face as a City?
With the economy still fragile and the council facing the prospect of further cuts in Government funding to come, the position is challenging. But we remain ambitious for Nottingham and have some key priorities we will be pursuing even in these difficult times.
One way to help protect our citys economy is to do what we can to create jobs and keep people in work through capital projects, and by encouraging inward investment. This is key to the cohesion and prosperity of the City and its why we pledged to cut unemployment over the next 4 years by a quarter. Creating new jobs and helping to sustain people in work are vital to supporting local people and their communities and the future economic wellbeing and prosperity of Nottingham . Its also vital for us to support young people into work, training or further education and this will be a major focus for us.
Educating our young people will continue to be right up there at the top of our list of priorities. While we have seen significant improvement in our school results, we want to do more and we will look to achieve ambitious new targets over the coming years.
We also want to continue to crack down on crime and to halve anti-social behaviour in the City as local people continue to tell us that this is an important issue for them. The fact that crime has more than halved in the city since 2003 and we are becoming more and more effective in tackling anti-social behaviour is making a real difference to the quality of peoples lives.
We want to continue to make our neighbourhoods places people are proud to live and work in. Nottingham has already been judged the cleanest big city in England . We want to maintain that achievement and also ensure that standards of cleanliness are high not just in the city centre but across all our neighbourhoods as well. That means continuing to keep on top of things like graffiti, flyposting and dog mess.
Supporting a green and sustainable Nottingham will also be a major issue for us. The development of lines 2 and 3 of the tram will be a focal point for our transport network across the city that will help to underpin the citys economic development. And with energy prices continuing to rise, we want to continue to pursue a cleaner and greener city with energy-efficiency, cutting carbon emissions and developing employment opportunities in the emerging green technology a major priority.
Finally, while these are some of our big issues, its important that we dont lose sight of the way we do things at the Council, particularly with a smaller opposition. So we will be looking to encourage greater transparency in our decision-making and widening the scrutiny of our decisions by inviting more people from outside the Council to get involved in this.
Nottingham is a great city. Im incredibly proud and honoured to have been elected as Leader once again and to be given the chance to help steer our city through the challenges and opportunities ahead.
Article source: http://www.cllrjoncollins.co.uk/?p=148
The Archbishop of Canterbury spoke out last week on the state of British politics
His words were widely considered to be an attack on the Conservative-Liberal Democrat government.
And while he undoubtedly aimed some strong comments in the government’s direction, I think his message was intended for all politicians.
Dr Rowan Williams is a spiritual leader of millions of people who thinks he is right he contribute to public debate. However challenging we might find that, he is always worth listening too and his thoughts worth reflecting upon.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has a particularly sharp mind. I saw this for myself as long ago as 2005 when the Anglican Church held a major international conference in Nottingham.
With the help of Rev. John Pennington, I wrote a welcoming speech which celebrated the history of Christianity in Nottingham. It is a rich history which includes, Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, born in Aslockton; William Booth, founder of the Salvation Army; and the venerable Mary Potter, founder of a nursing order of nuns.
Nottingham, we said, is the home of the most famous man of the cloth! There was silence while some of the most brilliant theological minds in the world tried to think who this person could be. The answer, of course, is Notts’ own, Friar Tuck. The line drew laughs while we told of the millions of references to him on the world wide web, but in a throw-away remark, we acknowledged, there was not one explanation of his theology.
The Archbishop of Canterbury spoke next. I can tell you the theology of Friar Tuck, he said. “Christian Socialist.” Friar Tuck carried Robin Hood halfway across a river and then dropped him into the water. Hard, he suggested, to think of a more dramatic example of the reversal of powers. Unprompted, the Archbishop had answered the throwaway question and we realised just how good he really is.
So what has he got to say about politics?
The Archbishop said what is happening in the Middle East and North Africa should prompt some basic thinking about democracy. … “Political debate in the UK at the moment feels pretty stuck.” … ‘Big Society’ is suspected to be opportunistic. … No-one voted for the current government’s proposals and there hasn’t been sufficient debate at the elections. … “What services must have cast-iron guarantees of nationwide standards, parity and continuity? … What is too important to be left to even the most resourceful localism?”
He labels modern politics as “managerial”; an unfortunate choice of word because it does not match his analysis. And we need good managers and good management, in all sectors.
Clarity and communication of vision, good planning, tracking outcomes, getting the capacity and capability in place with the right culture to get things done, all for legitimate aims is important. It is also vital to have a customer focus, learn from others, and work smarter rather than harder. Good management is essential to progress, and should not be described or treated as a political philosophy. He powerfully describes modern politics as “attempting with shrinking success to negotiate life in the shadow of big finance”.
The questions I heard as a parliamentary candidate in South Derbyshire in 2010 back that up. Why were bankers getting huge bonuses when they’d been bailed out with our money? Why couldn’t small businesses get the loans they needed to meet orders? Why can’t local people do the local jobs?
However much the public might have bought into free-markets and privatisation in the eighties, they now expect more than big finance is enabling. Why has the property-owning democracy resulted in people having to wait years before they can start a mortgage? Why has the investment in the regions been replaced by corporation tax breaks that so favour the City of London?
The reaction to the Archbishop’s editorial has focussed on the Government, when he, like a number of commentators, wonders what Labour’s big idea is going to be. A bit unfair since after defeat, Labour should “pause, listen and reflect”. It may well be four years to the next General Election and a lot can and will change. (We can certainly expect more government u-turns!)
The Labour party can meet the challenge. Examples of Labour successfully making an appeal by applying its values to meet public concerns include – for Britain with New Labour in 1997; for our city with “Respect for Nottingham” in 2003; and even for Wollaton East by picking up on planning concerns this year.
The Archbishop is telling all political parties something very powerful by saying it’s time to come out of the shadow of big finance. The Labour Party, in fashioning a new appeal, needs to pay heed.
Nottingham Labour would like to thank the voters for their support and trust they have placed in us to deliver our manifesto commitments. Over the next week, we will be putting new pages with contact details, surgery details and other useful information. In the meant time, if you would like to contact your Labour Councillor you can find their contact details here.
To find the results for your ward you can visit the Nottingham City Council website results page here
This list of the tory & Lib Dem broken promises would be just for fun, except that it hurts so many people.
1. No frontline cuts
2. Protecting the NHS budget
3. 3,000 more police officers
4. Keeping VAT at 17.5%
5. Keeping the Future Jobs Fund
6. Keeping Education Maintenance Allowances
7. Preserving tax credits for middle earners
8. Removing the “couple penalty”
9. Scrapping tuition fees
10. No bonuses for bank directors
11. 3,000 more midwives
12. Three more army battalions
13. Pupil Premium additional to the schools budget
14. Keeping Child Benefit universal
15. Stopping A&E and maternity closures
16. A Post Office Bank
17. No new nuclear power stations
18. Removing high marginal tax rates
19. No cuts to the Royal Navy
20. Automatic prison sentence for carrying a knife
21. Cutting rail fares each year
22. Keeping the Child Trust Fund for the poorest families
23. No more top down NHS reorganisations
24. No cuts to public spending this year
“We are pleased that residents of Berridge ward were able to gain employment and training with the help of Labour led Nottingham City Council” said local Labour Councillors Carole Jones and M. Ibrahim. During a difficult economic climate, Labour led Nottingham City Council adapted a very pro active strategy to support residents of Nottingham under the slogan “we are on your side.”
A number of initiatives were put in place to help people in jobs and training, volunteering and apprenticeship schemes. Through these schemes, around 2000 residents of Nottingham gained jobs or a volunteering placement during 2010. In Berridge Ward, 87 people were employed through the Future Jobs Fund, 17 young people were employed as apprentices or trainees in the City Council and 31 people were supported in private sector employment. “This is a wonderful opportunity for me to get a job and support other unemployed people in the area” said Cynthia Fuller, who works as a Future Jobs Fund employee at Forest Fields Neighbourhood Centre on Wiverton Road. Her two other colleagues, Rob Hazlewood and Jani Islam, are also supported through Nottingham City Council Future Jobs Fund Scheme.
Helping people to get back into employment and improve their skills is the best support we can provide to those who are unemployed or facing threat of redundancy. We have been able to reduce unemployment for young people in the city during the last twelve months, but sadly, the current Lib Dem/Tory government have scrapped schemes like the Future Job Fund, which is very worrying for the residents of Berridge Ward.
Arboretum will soon benefit from new street lighting under a multi-million pound initiative. Labour led Nottingham City Council, supported by Arboretum’s Labour team, will see most lighting columns in the city replaced or upgraded in the next 5 years.
The scheme will ensure better lighting for a safer city.
The new streetlamps cast stronger light onto pavements and roads, increasing the safety of the area and deterring criminals. They also use less energy, reducing Nottingham’s carbon footprint.
Labour led Nottingham City Council is committed to providing good street lighting and sees it as a major contributor to creating safer, more pleasant neighbourhoods. The Council was awarded £44.6million from the then Labour led Department for Transport.
‘This is a really big deal’ added Councillor Byran. ‘There’s a real need for to improve lighting standards, and this will lead to improved road safety and crime reduction.’
Labour’s candidate for May’s Local elections Azad Choudhry said: “The old-style lights cast an unnatural orange glare into bedroom windows and up into the sky. The beam on the new lights is directed down more clearly onto the pavements and roads, with much less filtering into upstairs windows or the sky.”
Nottingham’s refusal to publish its spending on items of over £500 has attracted attention far in excess of the merits of the case. Eric Pickles has raised the matter on the floor of the Commons with a two and a half minute diatribe against Nottingham’s position. (We were flattered by the attention, but it did not justify such an accolade). The prime minister raised it in the Commons with the leader of the opposition in an attempt to do some point scoring (nothing wrong with that if you have the right issue, but this wasn’t it).
We’ve had the Conservative Party machine link up with the Murdoch press suggesting we’ve got “things to hide”. And on it continues. Now, in the last week, Mr Pickles is threatening to find legal powers prior to legislation in order to impose the measure. We genuinely can’t understand the fuss.
If it is all “sound and fury signifying nothing” then why, you may ask, do we not simply concede?
Well there are a number of reasons which are a combination of cost, principle, and practicality.
First the cost: Having spoken to a number of local authorities, including pilot authorities, it is clear that there is a cost in the form of the time hard-pressed finance staff can spend managing the queries. In some cases councils have taken on additional staff.
Then there is the cost in service departments following queries up. A reasonable parallel can be found in Freedom of Information Act enquiries, which we have calculated are costing £400,000 – £500,000 per annum to maintain. These are mainly generated either by media “fishing trips” or firms costing up contracts and trying to keep track of competitors.
Our view is that, in a period of cutbacks, servicing this sort of activity is not value for money and would detract from the very frontline services ministers say they want us to protect.
Second, there are issues of principle.
We do not yet live in a dictatorship where ministerial decree has the force of law.
In the UK ministerial wishes still need the support of the law to give them legitimacy. It does no harm reminding Ministers of this; nor the fact that local government is not yet a branch of the civil service. It is an independently elected body with accountability to its own electorate, not to Whitehall.
Added to that, this is the government of devolution and localism is it not? So why is behaving in such a petulant and centralist way?
And then there is the general Whitehall threshold for publication. I believe it is £25,000 which in effect is Nottingham City Council’s current threshold because it is our level of delegation and all decisions to spend above this threshold are published. So why one rule for central government and another for local government?
Finally, practicality: Publishing accounts straight from the ledger, which is about all councils can afford to do, obfuscates more than it illuminates. It provides acres of unintelligible units of expenditure accompanied by vague descriptions which simply lead to misinformation, solicit further enquiry, and adds to costs.
Councils also risk publishing personal details which breach the data-protection legislation – there are numerous examples. This means more time and effort has to go into filtering the unintelligible to comply with the act (and rightly so).
Someone, somewhere had to tell the emperor he had no clothes, and as horrifying a prospect it might be in this instance, it has to be done. When the the law is enacted we will comply and do so with good grace, but until then Mr Pickles will have to wait. The final say, however, goes to a high profile member of Mr Pickles’ party who came over, shook my hand and said: ‘I wish my council has had the courage to stand up against it. But we are in a different place.”
Graham Chapman
Nottingham Labour leader Jon Collins and Shadow Leader of The House of Commons, Hilary Benn MP today announced Nottingham Labour’s Manifesto for the 2011 local elections at a meeting with local people and Labour Party members at the New Art Exchange, Hyson Green. After the launch Jon Collins issued a letter to residents of Nottingham that outlines Nottingham Labour’s commitment to the City and it’s people.
Dear Resident
We all know that with the Liberal Democrat and Conservative government’s decision to cut the Council’s grant by £60million and by at least that amount again over the next 4 years, whoever is elected to run the council on May 5th will have a tough job.
However, Nottingham Labour believes that mustn’t stop us being ambitious for our city or any less determined to make Nottingham a better place for us all to live and work.
In this newspaper we’re publishing a summary of our manifesto for the next 4 years. If re-elected our top 5 promises will be:-
Cut unemployment by a quarter.
Continue to cut crime and halve anti-social behaviour.
More school leavers getting a job, training or further education than any other city.
Your neighbourhood as clean as the city centre.
Help you keep your energy bills down.
Because we’ve helped halve crime, made the City cleaner, doubled re-cycling rates, helped school-leavers get their best ever GCSE grades, and invested in every neighbourhood in Nottingham as we promised, you can trust us to deliver over the next 4 years too.
Nottingham is a great city with a great history and a fantastic future too, but time and again our opponents only want to knock Nottingham and run the city down. Nottingham Labour will never do that – we’re proud of our city, its communities and our people and proud of what we achieve together.
Locally, as nationally, our opponents don’t care about keeping their promises, but we do. We’ll keep our manifesto promises if you vote for us on Thursday 5 May.
Yours Faithfully
Jon Collins
Nottingham Labour Manifesto Pledges
Cut unemployment by a quarter.
Continue to cut crime and halve anti-social behaviour.
More school leavers getting a job, training or further education than any other city.
Your neighbourhood as clean as the city centre.
Help you keep your energy bills down.
Working Nottingham
Cut unemployment by a third.
Create 1000 new jobs for local people in the science and energy sector.
Increase the proportion of Council employees who are city residents.
Create 500 jobs and 600 training places in the construction industry.
Support the creation of 20 new social enterprises helping 500 more people into self-employment.
Respect for Nottingham
Continue to cut crime and halve anti-social behaviour.
Introduce more alcohol-free zones to tackle street-drinking in communities that want it.
Reduce young people involved in crime by a third.
Crack down on off-licences selling alcohol to people who are drunk and disorderly.
Require Nottingham City Homes to evict drug dealers and violent offenders.
A Nottingham for Young People
More school leavers getting a job, training or further education than any other big city.
Increase the number of pupils getting 5+ good GCSEs including English and Maths by a quarter.
Work to rebuild or renovate every school in the city.
Fund early intervention activities that have been shown work.
Reduce absence in city Primary Schools to 6% or less.
Cleaner, Greener Nottingham
Make your neighbourhood as clean as the city centre.
Help you keep your energy bills down.
Crack down on dog fouling in our neighbourhoods.
Install solar panels to 2000 council houses.
Simplify recycling so more materials can be collected together in fewer bins.
Senior Nottingham
Ensure all care service users get the telecare emergency assistance scheme.
SmartWater the property of every pensioner who wants it for free.
Give every eligible pensioner control of their care with a personal budget.
Encourage housebuilders to provide bungalows for sale or rent in every community.
Create another ExtraCare scheme like Larkhill Retirement Village.
Transforming Nottingham’s Neighbourhoods
Tackle 100 vacant and derelict sites across the city to ensure they are brought back into use.
Build new swimming pools at Victoria Leisure Centre and on the Harvey Hadden site.
Develop new libraries in the one-stop shops in Bulwell and St Anns.
Continue to build and improve Council housing if allowed to by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Government.
Bring major parks up to Green Flag standard and improve The Forest, Highfields and Victoria Embankments Parks.
Getting Around Nottingham
Build lines 2 and 3 of the tram.
Introduce more 20mph zones in residential areas and outside schools.
Redevelop Nottingham’s Railway Station.
Remove unnecessary street furniture, signs and barriers from Nottingham’s streets.
Bring the Parking Warden service in-house so it is more responsive to the priorities of the public.
Choose Nottingham
Support the top 100 small firms in the city to create jobs for local people.
Sustain Nottingham’s top 5 ranking as a centre for shopping and reduce vacant shops by a third.
Further develop CityCard as a passport to free or cheap access to Council services, travel and discounts.
Ensure the Council buys local products and services.
Redevelop Sneinton Market and improve Trinity Square as attractive public open space.
Serving Nottingham
Make Nottingham the most customer-friendly Council in the country and increase user satisfaction to more than 90%
Make local independent debt and money advice services available across the city.
Bring public services together so they can be better delivered through one-stop shops.
Extend the opening hours of Council Offices so services can be delivered when most needed.
Raise £33m by selling unwanted Council land and invest it in better housing, leisure centres and parks.